3d printers provide an easy to use infrastructure to create objects for class room demonstration. High-school students delve into geometry when given the chance to constructing their own items.
Basic geometric concepts are communicated in the form of mathematical puzzles. The mathematical foundations are embraced upon constructing new puzzles based on the same principles.
3d visualization by computer graphics has revolutionized teaching the subject of geometry. Printed models provide haptic feedback, and animations help to translate temporal evolution in solid models.
Codes used by 3d printers are based on triangulations or other dissections of the surface area. They are solely based on the positions of the body's edges. Thus, the printer code for polytopes offers unique opportunities to connect stereoscopic conception and coordinates in R3. In workshops at high schools the students see their ideas take form via 3d printing.
Feedback at home is an important determinant in mathematics education. In an outreach project parents and pupils are guided towards an appreciative interaction about a mathematical topic.
Mathematics sets rules on regular and quasi-periodic tilings of the plane, and the segmentation of higher-dimensional volumes and spaces. It is enlightening to phrase these laws in form of mathematical puzzles. This approach of teaching is practices with teachers in the seminar Mathematics Education on Fundamental Ideas.
Students explore the historical context of a model, and report their results in the seminar Mathematics Education on Fundamental Ideas.
The Göttingen collections hosts a wealth of plaster models of singular cubic surfaces. The singular features can only approximately be represented in a plaster model, they cause problems in scanning the models, and special care is needed at these points to generating mechanically stable 3d prints file from the scans. An approach to achieve viable models from our 3d printer was established in the seminar Singularities of Clebsch Diagonal Surfaces.
Many models in the Göttingen Collection of Mathematical Models and Instruments have been build as part of diploma theses in the late 19th and early 20th century. In the past winter didactics students have designed two new models: A model showing the poles of the Riemann Zeta function, and an illustration of the emergence of fractal structures by multiple reflections in four spheres.
Mathematics lectures in differential equations often focus on models that can be solved analytically. Physics lectures in theoretical mechanics augment this approach by perturbation theory around these solutions. The seminar Singularities of Geometrical Models in Physics and Mathematics rather emphizises topological approaches. Hence, one can classify the space of solutions of differential equations, and pinpoints the role of bifurcations in changing the qualitative structure of solutions. The theory was mostly developed based on historical models. Where appropriate however, students engineered new models.
Singularities persist for example in the solution of the wave equation. For this and many other physical models they provide a scaffold of the quantitative modeling of observations. On the other hand, singularities are unphysical mathematical idealizations. How are these contradicting observations reconsiled in real-world models? The seminar Singularities of Geometrical Models in Physics and Mathematics brought together Masters students in the programs of Didactics of Mathematics and the Physics of Complex Systems to explore this question from different perspectives.
![]() |
![]() |
|