Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- book:chap3:3.4_constants_of_motion_cm [2022/01/30 03:56] – new Remark 3.7: determine the length, $L$, of a path in space. jv
+++ book:chap3:3.4_constants_of_motion_cm [2024/12/16 15:32] (current) – jv
@@ Line 154: / Line 154: @@
 \end{align*}
 The last equality should be understood here as a definition of the final expression that is interpreted here in the spirit of the substitution rule of integration.
+Moreover, $\mathbf F (t)$ denotes here the force acting on the particle at time $t$, where the particle is at the position $\mathbf q (t)$ and moving with velocity $\dot{\mathbf q} (t)$,
+i.e., one may also have $\mathbf F \bigl( \mathbf q(t) \bigr)$, or $\mathbf F \bigl( \mathbf q(t), \dot{\mathbf q} (t) \bigr)$, or an explicit time dependence on top of the dependence on the particle position.
 <WRAP box round>**Definition 3.5** <wrap em>Work and Line Integrals</wrap> \\
@@ Line 171: / Line 174: @@
 \]
 </WRAP>
 <wrap lo>** Remark 3.5. **
+Here, $\mathbf F (t)$ denotes the force that is acting on the particle at time $t$, irrespective of how it emerges. Specifically, the time dependence of $\mathbf F (t)$ accounts for changes of the position $\mathbf q(t)$, the velocity $\dot{\mathbf q}(t)$, and any additional time dependences due to external incluences (if applicable).
+</wrap>
+<wrap lo>** Remark 3.6. **
 The scalar product $\mathbf F \cdot \mathrm{d}\mathbf q$ or $P(t) = \mathbf F (t) \cdot \dot{\mathbf q} (t)$
 singles out only the action of the force parallel to the trajectory.
@@ Line 187: / Line 194: @@
 </wrap>
-<wrap lo #remark_line-integral_length-parameterization>** Remark 3.6. **
+<wrap lo #remark_line-integral_length-parameterization>** Remark 3.7. **
 The result of the integral does not rely on the parameterization of the path by time.
 For instance mathematicians prefer to use the length $\ell$ of the path.
@@ Line 200: / Line 207: @@
 </wrap>
-<wrap lo #remark_length-of-lines>** Remark 3.7. **
+<wrap lo #remark_length-of-lines>** Remark 3.8. **
   Line integrals are also used to determine the length, $L$, of a path in space.
   After all, the length amounts to the time integral of the speed, $\dot\ell(t)$,
   and one has
   \begin{align*} %  \label{eq:}
-    L = \int\rmd\ell
+    L = \int\mathrm{d}\ell
-    = \int \rmd t \: \dot\ell(t)
+    = \int \mathrm{d} t \: \dot\ell(t)
-    = \int \rmd t \: \frac{\dotvec q^2(t)}{\dot\ell(t)}
+    = \int \mathrm{d} t \: \frac{\dot{\mathbf q}^2(t)}{\dot\ell(t)}
-    = \int \rmd \vec q \cdot \frac{\dotvec q(t)}{\dot\ell(t)}
+    = \int \mathrm{d} \vec q \cdot \frac{\dot{\mathbf q}(t)}{\dot\ell(t)}
-    = \int \rmd \vec q \cdot \frac{\rmd \vec q(\ell)}{\rmd\ell}
+    = \int \mathrm{d} \vec q \cdot \frac{\mathrm{d} \vec q(\ell)}{\mathrm{d}\ell}
   \end{align*}
-  This is further illustrated in [[#quest__lineIntegral_venyl-disc|Problem 3.22]].
+  This is further illustrated in [[3.6_problems#quest__lineIntegral_venyl-disc|Problem 3.22]].
-\end{remark}
+</wrap>
@@ Line 236: / Line 243: @@
 </WRAP>
-<wrap lo>** Remark 3.7. **
+<wrap lo>** Remark 3.9. **
 Conservative forces only depend on position, $\mathbf F = \mathbf F (\mathbf q)$.
 They neither explicitly depend on time nor on the velocity $\mathbf q$.
 </wrap>
-<wrap lo>** Remark 3.8. **
-Conservative forces only depend on position, $\mathbf F = \mathbf F (\mathbf q)$.
-They neither explicitly depend on time nor on the velocity $\mathbf q$.
-</wrap>
 <WRAP box round>**Example 3.8** <wrap em>Conservative forces: (counter-)examples</wrap> \\
@@ Line 288: / Line 291: @@
 **qed**
-<wrap lo>** Remark 3.9. **
+<wrap lo>** Remark 3.10. **
 The work performed along a closed path vanishes for conservative forces.
 After all, in that case $\mathbf q_1 = \mathbf q_0$ such that $W = \Phi (\mathbf q_0) - \Phi( \mathbf q_1) = 0$.
 </wrap>
-<wrap lo>** Remark 3.10. **
+<wrap lo>** Remark 3.11. **
 The potential in itself is not an observable. ((An //observable// is a quantity that can be measured by direct observation.))
 One can only observe the work, which is the potential difference between two positions,
@@ Line 344: / Line 347: @@
 </WRAP>
-<wrap lo>** Remark 3.11. **
+<wrap lo>** Remark 3.12. **
 According to [[#Thm_work |Theorem 3.3]] differences of the value of the potential between two positions
 amount to the work performed in the potential.
@@ Line 361: / Line 364: @@
 </wrap>
-<WRAP lo>** Remark 3.12. **
+<WRAP lo>** Remark 3.13. **
 One can make use of the properties of scalar products to reduce the computational work
 to determine the force for a given potential